Dovenby Village

Know your past, appreciate what is special, preserve our environment

All content are opinions and objections that were raised as part of the response to Msport planning application to Allerdale planning ref 2/2014/0350.  If you have any comment or disagreement then first realise that opinion is just that, opinion in a public planning process.  You may email factual errors to Contact @ dovenbynoise.info

A rural village with a medieval heritage - but an industrial estate imposed beside it

   Information & action to preserve rural tranquility

Contact DovenbyVillage.info email | Terms & conditions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. POLICY STATEMENT ................................................................................................3


2. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE ......................................................................................3


3. RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY.........................................................................5


4. NOISE MONITORING.................................................................................................6


5. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................7


6. CATEGORIES OF USE/OPERATION CONTROLS....................................................8


7. COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE...................................................................................10


APPENDIX A....................................................................................................................11

GLOSSARY OF TERMS.......................................................................................12

DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................13


APPENDIX B ...................................................................................................................14


ZONE MAP ...............................................................................................………………15


1. POLICY STATEMENT


It is the objective of M-Sport Limited to ensure that the surrounding amenity is not adversely affected by noise arising from activities associated with the use of M-Sport Evaluation Centre (MEC) test track.


2. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

2.1. This Noise Management Plan is dated 7 September 2016 and has been produced by Northern Developments (Cumbria) Limited (ND) for M-Sport Limited (M-Sport) of Dovenby Hall, Cockermouth, Cumbria, CA13 0PN.

2.2. This Noise Management Plan (NMP) has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of condition 6 of the planning permission for the Development granted on 16 January 2015 (reference: 2/2014/0350), as amended by an application under Section 96A (reference: AM/2014/0350) (Planning Permission).

Condition 6 of the Planning Permission provides that:

"No operational use of the test track facility shall commence until an updated Noise Management Plan based on the principles and community noise levels set out in the Noise Management Plan Issue No 1 dated November 2014 – excluding category 1 activity which shall not be permitted, and save that the updated plan must include maximum noise levels as provided for below, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and until the completion of physical testing on site in order to demonstrate compliance with the agreed noise levels.

The Noise Management Plan shall include the following:

• LAeq 1 hour noise levels – see section 6.3

• Maximum noise levels measured in LAeq 5 minutes and LAmax – see sections 6.3 & 6.2

• Details of M Sport operational and management structure – see section 3

• Details of how the Council will access a noise monitoring scheme at all times – see section 4.4

• Details of the sound control and monitoring scheme and methodology used to demonstrate compliance with the community levels – see sections 6 & 5

• Details of the measures proposed to ensure compliance with the noise levels including reference to hours of operation, number of days and sound levels and the type of vehicles that will be permitted at the track – see section 6

• A detailed complaints procedure – see section 7


A review of the Noise Management Plan shall take place within the first six months of the operational use of the test track facility commencing and then annually thereafter. At all times the test track facility shall operate in accordance with the most recently approved Noise Management Plan. The test track shall operate at all times in accordance with the noise levels set out in the Noise Management Plan" (Condition 6).


2.3. Condition 6 requires the NMP to be reviewed by Allerdale Borough Council (ABC) in consultation with M-Sport within the first six months of the operational use of the MEC test track commencing and then annually thereafter. The purpose of the review is to assess compliance with the noise limits and operational issues associated with the MEC test track and make any necessary amendments to the NMP.

[Can an amendment be an increase or reduction in the noise levels and / or days of operation?]

2.4. The NMP has been produced by ND for M-Sport and provides noise limits and operational controls which meet the requirements of Condition 6 of the Planning Permission. The NMP also provides details of the noise monitoring scheme that will be undertaken by M-Sport in order to establish if the noise limits and operational controls are being met.

2.5. The main objective of the NMP is to ensure that the Community Levels resulting from operations of the MEC test track do not give rise to unacceptable amenity noise impacts. It provides a comprehensive noise control and management plan to ensure that the MEC test track can operate successfully without undue disturbance to the local community.

2.6. The nature of the controls required to manage noise impact within the community will be based on permitted noise levels for a specified number of days within a specified period of operation throughout a calendar year. The control method and principles included within this NMP shall form the basis of the operation of the facility.

2.7. This plan is based on motor vehicles travelling in a single direction, (counter clockwise) on the circuit, as intended and designed.

3. RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY

3.1. The Managing Director of M-Sport holds overall responsibility for the operation and management of the MEC and compliance with the NMP.


3.2. The Managing Director will appoint a Test Controller. The Test Controller is responsible for all day to day operations of the MEC test track and compliance with the NMP.


3.3. All persons involved with noise control and testing will be suitably trained,

i.e. have the knowledge, skills and experience to undertake environmental noise measurements. As a basic standard they will be required to obtain the Institute of Acoustics Certificate of Competence Environmental Noise Measurement.


3.4. The Test Controller may at times delegate operational control and responsibility for compliance with the NMP to a suitably trained person (as 3.3 above) appointed as Duty Test Steward.


3.5. The Duty Test Steward will have delegated powers to ensure effective control over the use of the MEC test track in accordance with the NMP even if the Test Controller or Managing Director is not in attendance. The Duty Test Steward shall have delegated powers that ensure that in matters relating to day to day noise management they cannot be overruled by any other representative of M Sport, their customers, or any MEC test track users. The overall responsibility for the operation of the track and compliance with the NMP on any day rests with the Managing Director as stated in 3.1.


3.6. The Test Controller will ensure that all operational staff are aware of the requirements of the NMP and ensure that it is implemented as required.


3.7. The Test Controller will be the first point of contact in relation to issues relating to the use of or noise arising from the MEC test track. Full contact details for the Test Controller will be available at all times on the M-Sport website at www.m-sport.co.uk.


3.8. The Test Controller is responsible for the satisfactory resolution of any complaints in accordance with the Complaints Procedure (see section 7) and ensuring that any corrective actions are carried out. A log of all complaints will be kept on site by the Test Controller and available for viewing upon reasonable notice by interested parties and ABC during working hours.


4. NOISE MONITORING

4.1.  As noted in section 3 this NMP includes the requirement for a Test Controller in the site management structure. The Test Controller will be responsible for and have authority to control all MEC test track activity. Such authority can be delegated to a Duty Test Steward. The Test Controller or a Duty Test Steward will be named as the responsible person every day the MEC test track is in use. It is noted that there may be more than one Test Controller or a Duty Test Steward available on a specific day and their duties under the NMP may be shared with other track functions and responsibilities that they hold. All people available to undertake the position of Duty Test Steward will be fully trained in their role and responsibilities as stated in 3.3.

4.2. The Test Controller or Duty Test Steward will have real time Track Data at all times that the MEC test track is in use, this Track Data will allow the positive management of all activities and resulting noise on the MEC test track which will allow MEC test track activities to be controlled in order to comply with the LAeq and LAFmax control levels set out in the NMP. The Track Data will be measured and displayed in real time in the track control room, where the Track Controller / Duty Test Steward will be based.

4.3. Each time the MEC test track is used a full log will be retained, recording noise levels, actual LAeq and LAFmax levels during each hour, as well as type/model of vehicle, driver details, start and finish times.  As weather conditions, in particular wind speed and direction, can have an effect on noise propagation, the weather, wind direction and speed will also be measured and logged. As informed by modelling and validation testing the impact will be assessed and track operations will be adjusted accordingly to ensure compliance with the NMP and that Community Levels are not exceeded. [New sentence]

4.4. Within 24 hours of each day of use the Track Data will be uploaded onto a dedicated area/page within the M Sport web site at www.m-sport.co.uk. Officers of ABC will be afforded direct access [deleted in the control room] to all live Track Data being recorded at the MEC at any time.

4.5. Noise data will be compared against the noise pyramid system; the data will include category days used to date.

4.6. All Track Data recorded shall be stored for a minimum period of 24 months.

4.7. All noise/weather monitoring equipment will be installed and commissioned by a specialist installer and tested before use, then calibrated as required or as a minimum annually thereafter with certification to be provided, retained and published on the M-Sport web site.

5. METHODOLOGY

5.1 The operational procedures are based upon carrying out noise monitoring at all times during use of the MEC test track via a trackside monitoring system.

5.2 Monitoring to determine compliance with the NMP shall be undertaken using integrating-averaging sound level meter(s) or equivalent instrument(s) conforming to Type 1 standard, linked to a computer system providing live data, LAFmax levels and predicted LAeq levels to provide early warning and time remaining, allowing pre-emptive action to be taken to ensure compliance.

[Let us be fair, this is an improvement and shows that they are listening to reasonable constructive criticism]

The sensitivity of the equipment shall be checked by using an appropriate acoustic calibrator before and after each day’s use. Sound level meter calibration by the manufacturer will be carried out and certified annually (in excess of the requirements of the 2005 Control of Noise at Work Regulations, which state that a sound level meter should be returned every two years for calibration).

All noise measurements will be carried out in accordance with BS7445-1 2003 [Description and measurement of environmental noise. Guide to quantities and procedures].

Measured noise levels in wind speeds above 5m/s or where the microphone is affected by heavy precipitation will be annotated accordingly.

5.3 The noise levels will be measured 10m from the trackside by permanent noise monitoring equipment. The measured noise levels at trackside will be used to calculate the noise levels at the noise sensitive receptors to determine if the noise limits have been complied with. The location(s) of the track side monitor(s) will ensure that the noise levels, from the track, at the noise sensitive receptors can be accurately calculated.

Optimum location(s) will be selected following construction and the track will not be operated until ABC has approved the same in writing.

[This is a change but it still allows for the possibility of a single location to be used.  See my objection about multiple locations being necessary for accurate recordings]

5.4 An anemometer and wind vane will be installed in an optimum position, to be agreed with the local authority, the track will not be used until ABC has approved the same in writing. They will be used to measure wind speed and direction.

This data will be used to adjust forecast community noise levels, based upon computer modelling and on site validation.

[Again, a sensible adjustment as a reaction to our objections, to be appreciated.]

5.5 The noise level controls are stated as Community Levels; the method of checking compliance is based on the agreed noise reduction between source and receptor and will take account of weather conditions. The agreed noise reduction shall be confirmed in writing by the local planning authority following the completion of physical testing and prior to the first operational use of the track, and as part of any future review of the NMP. No amendments to the agreed noise reduction will be approved unless it can be demonstrated, for example, through the introduction of additional mitigation measures, that noise control levels at the community receptors will not be exceeded.


6. CATEGORIES OF USE/OPERATION CONTROLS

6.1. The pyramid below provides the controlled noise levels at noise sensitive receptors, as a direct effect of operation of the MEC test track only; this does not and cannot take account of extant background noise levels which vary constantly.

6.2. Community LAFmax levels from operation of the MEC have been set at 73dB and 76dB as indicated on the zone map in Appendix B. These levels have been reached following research, consideration and dialogue with ABC. In the absence of any legislation or clear precedent, levels have been set that are rational, reasonable and demonstrable. Importantly levels within the norms already experienced.

[The Officer Report for Approval states noise MUST NOT exceed 5dB above average noise.  This 73dB forces sudden increases of 28dB and is totally unacceptable and likely to lead to noise nuisance complaints being upheld in legal proceedings.  It is wiser to set reasonable limits now so the business practice can be designed to meet sensible limits; the alternative is for the courts to set a much lower noise limit and take the opportunity to reduce the number of days of operation which could affect the sustainability of the business plan.  Be sensible now or regret later!]

6.3. A pyramid system has been adopted in agreement with ABC to control average noise levels over 1 hour, LAeq1hour (as consented on 16th January 2015, reference 2/2014/0350) and an additional control over a shorter period of 5 minutes LAeq 5min (as directed by the revised condition 6 (issued on 1st October 2015, reference AM/2014/0350) as follows:

[Allerdale’s own noise consultant suggests only 3dB for Laeq 5mins, not 5dB]

6.4. The uses shall be limited as set out below:


i. Category A activity shall not exceed forty five days in any calendar year.


ii. Category B activity shall not exceed seventy five days in any calendar year.


iii. Category C activity is unrestricted.

[See my objection letter, noise nuisance complaints upheld in court have not allowed so many days of use so lower noise limits for Laeq 5mins and LAMax will reduce the likelihood of noise nuisance procedures being taken that could impose lower noise levels than suggested here.]

6.5 The Categories referred to are defined as follows:


i. Category A – The Community Levels shall apply at any noise sensitive receptor.

This category of use shall only occur between Monday to Friday of no more than one day of use per week and no more than five consecutive hours use during the day.

Category A use is only permitted between 09.30 hours and 16.30 hours.

After each category A track use day there will be at least one day of no track use other than category C use.


ii. Category B – The Community Levels shall apply at any noise sensitive receptor.

This category of use shall only occur between Monday to Saturday of no more than two days use per week

and no more than seven consecutive hours of use during the day within the hours of use limitations set out below at 6.7. There shall only be one Saturday use per month.

After each category B track use day there will be at least one day of no track use other than category C use.

iii. Category C -The Community Levels shall apply at any noise sensitive receptor.

Unrestricted use between the days of Monday and Saturday and within the hours of use limitations set out below at 6.7.

6.6. There shall be no category A, B or C usage permitted on Sundays or Bank Holidays.

Saturdays shall be restricted to Category B and C days only,

Category B use is limited to a maximum of one Saturday per month.

6.7. No use of the track permitted by this consent shall occur:

i. before 08.30 hours or after 17.00 hours from the commencement of British Summer Time in any one year;

ii. before 08.30 hours or after 19.00 from the commencement of Greenwich Mean Time in any one year.

6.8. Not more than one vehicle shall be tested at any one time on the test track for category A usage. ensuring that the facility is not used for competition

[This should state that only one car shall use the track at any time.]


6.9. Any type of vehicle is permitted to use the test track subject to compliance with the controls above.

6.10. There shall be no public address system intelligible at the boundary of the site, any such system shall not be operated until the installation is agreed with ABC in writing.


6.11. The NMP is designed to provide proactive noise management in that M-Sport is responsible for monitoring and controlling the noise. If an event is scheduled as a Category B day (< LAeq 1 hour 50dB) and the highest hour exceeds 50dB then M Sport has used one of the 45 Category A 55dB days. This is an important part of the system, to ensure the number of Category Days for each Category Use is not exceeded annually.

[This should state If an event is scheduled as a Category B or C day and the highest measure of noise exceeds the noise limit whether measured as Laeq 1hour or Laeq 5 minute or Lamax then the day shall be classed as the higher category.  

A Category B day is also defined as having Laeq 5 minutes and LAMax so exceeding any definition of Category B must raise the Category to the next highest Category]

6.12. A log of Category Days used and days available will be maintained on the dedicated webpage.




In the event that any of the noise control levels (LAeq 1hour, LAeq 5mins, LAFmax) are exceeded at any time, testing shall immediately cease whilst investigations are undertaken to ascertain the cause.


Testing shall not continue until any measures necessary to avoid repetition have been identified and implemented.


Within 24 hours of the resumption of testing, a report shall be submitted to ABC identifying the nature and cause of the breach, as well as any steps taken to avoid repetition.


[This para should state “All use of the track for testing shall immediately cease


The word “testing can be used ambiguously and the offender could be removed from the track to be replaced by a succession of offenders, each being removed subsequent to the next predictable offence.  


If a class of vehicle all make an offending noise (eg they all have offending levels of backfire) then they could all be tested and each withdrawn after its test and after committing a predictable noise offence.


“Testing” is not defined enough for lawful enforcement purposes and could allow each car to be “tested” and removed and then the next car “tested”  - see above & my objection letter]


7. COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

7.1.Noise complaints can be made by calling or emailing the Test Controller or Duty Test Steward. Details will be provided on the M-Sport website at www.m­sport.co.uk.


7.2.Each complaint will be logged and acknowledged as soon as possible upon receipt, during working hours.

The Test Controller or Duty Test Steward will speak to the complainant at the earliest possible opportunity during working hours to discuss the details of the complaint and agree a timescale for the investigation and for further responding to the complainant (in accordance with the diagram below).

The complaint will be investigated by accessing the Track Data for the time in question.


7.3.Complaints will be addressed using the following procedure below:


7.4.Out of hours complaints will be recorded via a telephone answering machine or collected by e-mail and dealt with on the next working day as above.


GLOSSARY OF TERMS


Community Levels The noise level received at noise sensitive receptors as a direct result of operations at the facility, (Measured in LAeq(1hour), LAeq(5min) LAFmax).  

  

dB Sound levels from any source can be measured in frequency bands in order to provide detailed information about the spectral content of the noise, i.e. whether it is high-pitched, low-pitched, or with no distinct tonal character. These measurements are usually undertaken in octave or third octave frequency bands. If these values are summed logarithmically, a single dB figure is obtained. This is usually not very helpful as it simply describes the total amount of acoustic energy measured and does not take any account of the ear’s ability to hear certain frequencies more readily than others.  


dB(A) Instead, the dBA figure is used, as this is found to relate better to the loudness of the sound heard. The dBA figure is obtained by subtracting an appropriate correction, which represents the variation in the ear’s ability to hear different frequencies, from the individual octave or third octave band values, before summing them logarithmically. As a result the single dBA value provides a good representation of how loud a sound is.  


LAeq Since almost all sounds vary or fluctuate with time it is helpful, instead of having an instantaneous value to describe the noise event, to have an average of the total acoustic energy experienced over its duration. The LAeq, 07:00 – 23:00 for example, describes the equivalent continuous noise level over the 12 hour period between 7 am and 11 pm. During this time period the LpA at any particular time is likely to have been either greater or lower that the LAeq, 07:00 – 23:00.  


[For the purposes of planning enforcement LAeq 1 hour is to be calculated as the highest LAeq 1 hour and LAeq 5 minutes is to be calculated as the highest LAeq 5 minutes during continuous measurement of the testing day.


LAeq 1 hour, LAeq 5mins should be clearly defined or they are not lawfully enforceable.  The proposed definition could allow for all noise and all silence in a 12 hour period to be divided by 12 to hide very noisy hours when averaged with periods of silence.  ]


LAFmax The LAmax is the loudest instantaneous noise level. This is usually the loudest 125 milliseconds measured during any given period of time  

[The word “usually” must be deleted or it creates ambiguity in enforcement]

DEFINITIONS


NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN v3 Sept 7th 2016 (with comments and annotations by objectors)

M-Sport Evaluation Centre (MEC) test track 2.5km test track as approved by planning reference 2/2014/0350 on 16th January 2015.  


The Development M Sport Evaluation Centre (B1), testing and evaluation facility (2.5km in length) (Sui Generis), car parking (242spaces), earthworks including sound attenuation bunds, surface water attenuation ponds, grounds maintenance shed incorporating fuel store (B1 & B8) and separate underground fuel tank.  


Managing Director The most senior role in any company. With ultimate responsibility for the company's performance and liabilities.  


Test Controller A person appointed by the Managing Director with operational responsibility and authority to ensure compliance with the Noise Management Plan amongst other responsibilities.  


Institute of Acoustics Certificate of Competence Environmental Noise Management As detailed on the Institute of Acoustics website at www.ioa.org.uk/education-training/certificate-competence-environmental-noise­measurement  


Duty Test Steward A person appointed by the Test Controller with sufficient skills, knowledge and authority to carry out the duties of the Test Controller.  


Interested Parties Anyone in the locality who may be directly affected by the operation of the test track.  


Real Time Track Data Noise data gathered using sound meters, software and dedicated PC showing real time level v time data in track control room with editing and calculation facility allowing for display of graphs with markers and noise sources with descriptors, to ensure compliance with the Noise Management Plan and pre­emptive actions to prevent breach of average noise level controls.  


Noise Pyramid System As illustrated in section 6.3  


Category Days As defined in Section 6 of this document.  


Integrating-Averaging Sound Level Meter An instrument that measures sound energy over a period of time.  


Type 1 Standard Precision Grade for laboratory and field use. Tolerance of ± 0.7dB  


Acoustic Calibrator A hand-held device that emits an audible tone of very accurate level and frequency. Before making noise measurements the Calibrator is fitted over the meter's microphone and the reading is either checked manually by the user or automatically by the meter.  


Noise Sensitive Receptors Locations or areas where dwelling units or other fixed, developed sites of frequent human use occur.  


Anemometer A device used for measuring wind speed.  


Wind Vane A device used for measuring wind direction.  


Agreed Noise Reduction Noise reduction between source and receptor can be calculated by formula Lp2 = 20 log (R2 / R1) + Lp1 (where Lp1 = sound pressure level at location 1 (dB) Lp2 = sound pressure level at location 2 (dB) R1 = distance from source to location 1 R2 = distance from source to location 2) but this is further complicated by absorption and barriers; ultimately this is only a theoretical reduction. The Agreed Noise Reduction will be established by on site testing.  


Extant Background Noise Levels The noise levels currently experienced in the local community.  


Greenwich Mean Time The mean solar time at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, London. GMT was formerly used as the international civil time standard, now superseded in that function by Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Today GMT is considered equivalent to UTC for UK civil purposes  


British Summer Time Begins at 01:00 GMT on the last Sunday of March and ends at 01:00 GMT (02:00 BST) on the last Sunday of October. During British Summer Time (BST), civil time in the United Kingdom is advanced one hour forward of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) (in effect, changing the time zone from UTC+0 to UTC+1)